Emanuele Caminada

Husserl-Archives: Centre for Phenomenology and Continental Philosophy
Kardinaal Mercierplein 2 - box 3200
3000 Leuven
Belgium

tel: +32 16 37 68 81
contact
query=user:U0110349 year:[2005 TO 2025] &institution=lirias&from=1&step=20&sort=scdate
showing 1 to 20 of 118
Items per page 10 |20 |50
Sort newest first |author |title |popularity
Type all | articles | presentations | conferences | chapters | other | reports | phd theses | book reviews | books | outreach | edited books | invited lectures
1/6
  • other
    Caminada, Emanuele;Lago de Sousa Barroso, gabriel; 2025. Phenomenology and Differential Anthropology.
    LIRIAS4210240
    description
    Organizer of conference

    Accepted
  • editedbook
    2025. Essays on Husserl’s Kaizo Articles. Publisher: Alber
    LIRIAS4210251
    description


    Accepted
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Manuscripts, Archives, and Thinking. Digital Tracking of Husserl’s Letter and Spirit.
    LIRIAS4210238
    description


    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Experience and Judgements. Thinking Through and Beyond Languages.
    LIRIAS4210243
    description
    Inaugural lecture

    Published
  • other
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Phänomenologie braucht einen langen Atem. Über laufende Projekte und das Laufen als Projekt. A Tribute to Thomas Vongehr.
    LIRIAS4210227
    description
    Organizer of

    Published
  • other
    Yaegashi, Toru;Ndoye, Bado;De Monticelli, Roberta;Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Round Table: Kaizo 1923-2023: Global Renewal of Reason?.
    LIRIAS4210245
    description
    Organizer of Round Table at XXV World Congress of Philosophy Rome 2024

    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Grafting Humanity.
    LIRIAS4210235
    description
    Round Table Kaizo 1923-2023: Global Renewal of Reason?

    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Functionaries of Humanity: The Husserl Archives and the UNESCO.
    LIRIAS4210236
    description
    Invited Session

    Published
  • chapter
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Ideal and Real Habits After Husserl. Phenomenology of Broken Habits: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Habitual Action; 2024; pp. 49 - 70 Publisher: Routledge
    LIRIAS4137394
    description
    Habits make ideas real. Conversely, in the process of habituation, ideas gain existential weight. This chapter argues that there is an inherent tension between ideality and reality in Husserl's account of habits. Accordingly, we can distinguish in the intentional structure of habits both a real and an ideal component, which interact with each other. The chapter proceeds as follows: It will briefly sketch why, phenomenologically, we should speak of habits in the plural, thereby addressing the tension between the “ideal” and “real” realms of habits. It then discusses this tension by examining two examples of ideal structures described by Husserl: personal habit as a structure of consistency, and attitude as an epistemic habit. In particular, is argued that Husserl’s theory of science presupposes a correlative conception of the concept of habitus, and that such a correlation can be addressed in both its ideal and real components. In a further step, attention will be given to the inertia of habits as they passively restructure themselves. Bruce Begout's deepening of Husserl's account of habituation is used to describe the way in which habits become real forces. The chapter concludes by attempting to answer the following questions What do habits do among themselves without our being aware of it? How and to what extent can we consciously integrate, coordinate, shape, or break habits? Do broken habits still live within us?

    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Towards a polyphonic account of resentment.
    LIRIAS4210234
    description
    In contemporary, post-modern social theory and decolonial philosophy, reference to resentment is almost ubiquitous. Žižek for instance refers to our postmodern condition as the age of resentment. From a philosophical perspective, it is important to note that the term is used with a semantic polyvalence that moves in the spectrum between Nietzsche's theory to Amery's opposing position. While for Nietzsche, resentment is the affective reaction of the weak who, due to their own inability to live up to confrontation, change in their unconscious their entire world perception guided by negative emotions, thus devaluing established values (Um- and Abwerten). In contrast, for Amery, resentment is the justified ability of victims to maintain the epistemic value of negative emotions: the ability to keep memory alive against aggressors is necessary to build a more just world. Thus, one can see on the one hand how the same emotion is regarded by Nietzsche as epistemic distortion and by Amery as epistemic reinforcement. I will attempt to read the polarity of these two characterisations through an interpretation of the intentionality of resentment inspired by Scheler's theory. If for Nietzsche, the emotional reaction leads to an Umwertung based on an emotional structure that could be regarded as unconscious reaction the leads to Umfühlen or even Abfühlen, for Amery resentment is the conscious ability to keep and reinforce Nachfühlen in memory in order to avoid Abfühlen, the loss of the epistemic value of negative emotions. My analysis will use as case studies the accounts of resentment in the sociological analyses of Israeli Eva Illouz and Palestinian social theorist and activist Zahi Zalloua. On the horizon of my analysis will therefore remain the question of the political consequences of the uses of resentment in the politics of memory, identity, and liberation (private and collective).

    Published
  • other
    Magomedov, Elad;Caminada, Emanuele;Cibotaru, Veronica; 2024. Co-organizer series of round tables "Thinking Through War Towards Peace" - Roundtable 3: Palestine/Israel: One Land, Two Peoples. In collaboration with 2024 Conference of the Tijdschrift voor Filosofie: Louvain Journal of Philosophy. With Amos Goldberg, Bashir Bashir, Zahi Zalloua.
    LIRIAS4207381
    description


    Published
  • other
    Descola, Philippe; 2024. Workshop with Philippe Descola (Husserl Memorial Lecture 2024).
    LIRIAS4210228
    description
    Organizer and respondent

    Published
  • other
    Magomedov, Elad;Caminada, Emanuele;Cibotaru, Veronica; 2024. Co-organizer series of round tables "Thinking Through War Towards Peace" - Roundtable 2: On Genocide. With Petar Bojanić, Davit Mosinyan, Lee Mordechai.
    LIRIAS4207379
    description


    Published
  • other
    Magomedov, Elad;Caminada, Emanuele;Cibotaru, Veronica; 2024. Co-organizer series of round tables "Thinking Through War Towards Peace" - Roundtable 1: Jurisdictions of Peace. With Katlijn Malfliet, Helder De Schutter, Nicolas Angelet.
    LIRIAS4207377
    description


    Published
  • journal-article
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. ‘Blind but Oriented’: Intentionality as Tendency. Human Studies; 2024; Vol. 47; iss. 2024; pp. 13 - 35
    LIRIAS4122536
    description
    In their descriptions of the life dynamics of tendencies as “blind but oriented,” both Scheler and Husserl outline an alternative model of intentionality to Brentano’s conception of mental reference to determinate objects or meanings. In my reading, their phenomenological consideration of tendential structures will reveal tendency as an essential moment of intentionality. A horizon of indeterminacy turns out to be constitutive of every intentional act as a tendency toward or away from something. This paper develops as follows: First, I will present Max Scheler’s nuanced differentiation of tendential life and the systematic horizon of his model of blind but oriented tendency, which seeks to offer an alternative to the mechanism/teleology dichotomy. Second, I will present Jocelyn Benoist’s framing of the same question in the opposition between blind drives and consciousness. Benoist’s radical critique of the interpretation of intentionality as a tendency condenses in his clear assertion that drives cannot be intentional because they are constitutively blind. Benoist accuses Edmund Husserl of nothing less than murdering intentionality through phenomenological vivisection, i.e., by extinguishing in reflection the tension inherent in conative intention and watering down the concept of intentionality to such an extent that it also includes cognitive acts. I will therefore turn my attention to the alleged culprit. I will show that Husserl’s broad concept of intentionality is not only negatively justified by the possibility of transforming tendencies into a consciousness of their implicit object, but rather positively justified by the directed dynamics of both passive and active forms of intentionality. In the conclusion I will show how Husserl’s constitutive analyses move along lines akin to Scheler’s insights and call for a revision of overly static interpretations of the phenomenological concepts of intentionality and teleology.
    Publisher: Springer Verlag
    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2024. Einstellungssache.
    LIRIAS4210233
    description
    Phänomenologische Einstellung/ Epoché/ Reduktion

    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2023. Vom Typus her und darüber hinaus: Denken ohne und zwischen Sprachen.
    LIRIAS4210282
    description


    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2023. Respondent Book presentation Phenomenology of Anxiety.
    LIRIAS4210230
    description
    Workshop and presentation of the book edited by Springer, (respondents: Prof. Helder de Schutter, Prof. Emanuele Caminada, Prof. Julia Jansen, Prof. Till Grohmann), Location: KU Leuven

    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2023. Skanderbeg’s Helmet and Digital Protocols.
    LIRIAS4122538
    description


    Published
  • presentation
    Caminada, Emanuele; 2023. Konstellationforschung als Netzwerkforschung.
    LIRIAS4210281
    description


    Published

1/6